Victims groups: We won’t back HIU legacy-issue plans.

“The legislation, as we have seen it to date, amounts to an act of bad faith by London. It bears little resemblance to the proposals outlined in the Stormont House Agreement Paul O’Connor.

VICTIMS groups that support relatives of people murdered by the state during the Troubles have said they will not support British government plans to deal with the past.

Relatives for Justice and the Pat Finucane Centre spoke out after draft legislation linked to the Stormont House Agreement was leaked this week. Concerns were raised this month by the Committee on the Administration of Justice over plans by the British government to “veto” information in reports by a new body investigating Troubles killings.
Under the agreement a Historical Investigations Unit (HIU) is expected to be set up to replace the defunct police Historical Enquires Team (HET), pictured below to take over some of the work carried out by the Police Ombudsman.

Historical Enquires Team (HET)

It will investigate unsolved killings and provide reports to families. There are also plans to establish an independent commission on information retrieval for victims and an oral history archive. Concerns have been raised previously about the independence of the planned HIU and some campaigners are worried that former police officers may be employed by it. Concerns have also been raised over plans by the British government to control what information is published through HIU reports on national security grounds. Relatives for Justice director Mark Thompson said his organisation would not back any organisation created by the legislation. “The legislation in no way, shape or form represents the SHA [Stormont House Agreement] document published last December,” he said. “It is a self-serving piece of legislation crafted by the British government that is essentially written through the lens of national security.” Paul O’Conner from the Pat Finucane Centre also said his organisation could not support draft legislation. “The legislation, as we have seen it to date, amounts to an act of bad faith by London. “It bears little resemblance to the proposals outlined in the SHA,” he said.
“There are major concerns regarding the criteria for cases to be re-examined, so-called national security caveats and other concerns too numerous to outline.” Sinn Féin (Shame Fein) MLA Gerry (The Mouth) Kelly has also claimed that the British government’s proposals were “unacceptable” and a “clear breach of the Stormont House Agreement”.
With many thanks to: Connla Young, for the origional story, The Irish News.

Author: seachranaidhe1

About Me I studied for six months training and became certified in Exam 070-271 in May 2010 and shortly after that became certifed in Exam 070-272. I scored highly in both Exams and hope to upgrade my path to M.C.S.A. ( Server Administrator ) in the near future.I also hold Level 2 Qualifications in three subjects Microsoft Word, Microsoft Powerpoint and Microsoft Spreedsheets. I have also expereance with Web Design using Microsoft Front-Page.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s